Tag Archives: organizational effectiveness
As of May 2013, Standard & Poors has completed its evaluation of non-financial firm management and governance factors for 2,190 publicly and privately rated North American companies and the results are dismal. S&P has also scored a global score to 3,868 firms with only 8% receiving its highest rating.
“Standard & Poors uses the management and governance scores to modify its evaluation of an enterprise business risk profile, a key component of its credit rating.” S&P’s methodology uses 15 criteria for evaluating corporate governance across five categories.
The categories include:
Management, which includes;
Risk management/financial management, and;
Organizational effectiveness; and
“The Management and Governance criteria for nonfinancial companies consist of eight management subfactors and seven governance subfactors. Depending on how an entity scores along these subfactor dimensions, S&P issues one of four scores: strong, satisfactory, fair, and weak.”
6% of firms scored “Strong”
26% of firms scored “Satisfactory”
65% of firms scored “Fair”
3% of firms scored “Weak”
In its May 13, 2013 press release, S&P disclosed the names of those companies that received a “Strong” or “Weak” designation. See the list in the May 13, 2013 press release.
TheGRCBlueBook mission is to become a global risk and compliance community site and resource portal for sharing best practice across all highly regulated industries. A one stop source for all things risk and compliance related.